“Remember, with Belgian Colts Never Say Never…”

(respectfully modified quote of Colt SAA authority John Kopec)

# Variations, Variations & More Variations

# The Coppell Classification

 

 

Mullie the Bullie, FROCS #9 is always complaining

and Mullie the Bullie FROCS #9 thoughtfully but nonetheless bitterly complains: “What a confusing story”…He sure has a point there.

Variations, variations & more variations: because Fabriques d’Armes Unies de Liège produced a great number of variations of the basic Colt Army M 1860, even more than Colt’s.

During the early days reasons seem to be the aspirations of Bill Edwards and Sig Shore in the USA in cooperation with the Hanquet cousins Paul and Albert in Belgium to reproduce all major known Colt models but also the ambition to have proprietary FAUL variations combined with the desire to use up existing inventory. From ca. 1970 another push for new variations was noted from the German dealer of FAUL, B. Harlos of Schwäbisch Hall.

At the Liège factory major constituents of the 1960 New Model Army were combined in ways that Old

Sam would not have dreamt of but today’s collectors’ community loves it.

# 4 versions of arbors:

1st version

2nd version

3rd version

4th version

# 4 different barrel lengths:

8“ barrel most common

7,5“ barrel early Cavalry Models

5,5“ barrel Marshal Models (aftermarket emblem on grip)

4“ barrel Pocket Army

 

 

 

# 3 variants of frames:

3-srew frame w/o cuts for stock

3-srew frame cut for stock

4-srew frame cut for stock

# 3 different chamber lengths (interior depth):

Early “large” chamber: 30,06 mm/1,183 in

Middle “mid-size” chamber: 27,35 mm/1.076 in

Late “small“ chamber: 22,75 mm/.896 in

# at least 3 different finish combinations (not counting factory engravings here):

Blued: barrel, wedge, cylinder, screws

Case colors: loading lever, frame, hammer

Silver plated: back strap, trigger guard

Blued: barrel, wedge, cylinder, backstrap, screws

Case colors: loading lever, frame. Hammer

Brass: trigger guard

High gloss polish/”in the white”: barrel, loading lever, cylinder, hammer, back strap

Blued: wedge, screws

Brass: trigger guard

# 3 types of factory front sights

Typical blade type of RNMA #8654

Post type of Pocket Army

Bead type of early Marshal #11337

# at least 2 different steal alloys used:

Carbon steel

Stainless steel

# 2 cylinder shapes:

Rebated cylinder

Fluted cylinder

# 2 different naval scenes on the cylinder:

Centaure proprietary naval scene

Colt/Ormsby-type naval scene

# back-straps with and without toe on butt:

Cut in the butt for shoulder stock

No cut in the butt

# frames without and with the corporate Centaure logo:

No corporate logo – early production

Corporate Centaure logo

# 2 types of Centaure logo:

Corporate logo rampant centaur

Corporate logo walking centaur

# different grip materials and finishes:

Varnished

Oiled

Oiled & Centaure logo emblem

Ivory

 

The Coppell Classification: we did not even start looking at factory markings and engravings in detail. But this situation obviously calls for some structuring of the major characteristics of the Belgian. Since nobody seems to have thought about it before I am herewith suggesting the following easy to use categorizing system of distinct visible features of Centaure variants and call it the … Coppell Classification … for Coppell in Texas near Dallas. Where Paden and I had a couple of beers when we sorted this out.

# major differences = model: barrel lengths and selected frame features

# intermediate differences = variations of the model: finishes, cylinder shapes, roll-engravings, corporate logo, alloys…

# minor differences = sub-variations of the variation: like different back-straps, front sights or markings…

This way, we end up with 5 models, plus their respective variations and sub-variations as applicable. To read more and for some in depths information on this subject please, visit the introductory chapter of the Models & Variations page.

And now our complaining pard Mullie the Bullie finally sees the light at the end of the tunnel...and it is not the train coming at him!

A more complex classification system was discussed during some brain storming but was turned down eventually: like the different

# versions of the arbors,

# number of threads of screws or nipples used,

# number of grooves of the barrel,

# welded or cast back-straps,

# forged or cast frames or hammers,

# vertical or horizontal arbor lock pins, # variations in the barrel markings,

# size or type of fonts used in the factory markings or

# Liège Proof house stamps, etc.

Because such an academic approach we leave to the more demanding collectors, wouldn’t you agree?

 

WDN/May 16, 2011

©2007-11 Wolf D. Niederastroth

 

Back